Estratto da
TRóPOS
Perspectives on Emancipation. Hermeneutic and Aesthetic Investigations
Antinomia e meontologia dell’inizio. Un confronto col pensiero dell’ultimo Pareyson e di Cacciari
TRóPOS
Perspectives on Emancipation. Hermeneutic and Aesthetic Investigations
Antinomia e meontologia dell’inizio. Un confronto col pensiero dell’ultimo Pareyson e di Cacciari
ENGLISH TITLE: Antinomy and Meontology of the Beginning. A comparison with the thought of the last Pareyson and of Cacciari
ABSTRACT: Facing “the Beginning–Problem” in Metaphysics leads to aporetical outcomes. I aim to show how in this field the Aristotelian principle of non–contradiction fails: the language which attempts to talk about “the Beginning–Problem” cannot avoid to accept truth as a way of paradox. However it seems to be something deeper than a shortcoming of language. My claim in this paper is that “the Beginning” is structured as a paradox in its own metaphysical outlines.
KEYWORDS: Beginning, Contradiction, Paradox, Indifference, Self–conception.
ABSTRACT: Facing “the Beginning–Problem” in Metaphysics leads to aporetical outcomes. I aim to show how in this field the Aristotelian principle of non–contradiction fails: the language which attempts to talk about “the Beginning–Problem” cannot avoid to accept truth as a way of paradox. However it seems to be something deeper than a shortcoming of language. My claim in this paper is that “the Beginning” is structured as a paradox in its own metaphysical outlines.
KEYWORDS: Beginning, Contradiction, Paradox, Indifference, Self–conception.
| pagine: | 183-202 |
| DOI: | 10.4399/978885488594310 |
| data pubblicazione: | Giugno 2015 |
| editore: | Aracne |